Termination w.r.t. Q of the following Term Rewriting System could not be shown:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a(x1) → b(c(x1))
b(a(b(x1))) → x1
c(c(x1)) → a(a(a(b(x1))))

Q is empty.


QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
  ↳ QTRS Reverse
  ↳ QTRS Reverse

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a(x1) → b(c(x1))
b(a(b(x1))) → x1
c(c(x1)) → a(a(a(b(x1))))

Q is empty.

Using Dependency Pairs [1,15] we result in the following initial DP problem:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

C(c(x1)) → A(a(b(x1)))
A(x1) → B(c(x1))
C(c(x1)) → A(b(x1))
A(x1) → C(x1)
C(c(x1)) → B(x1)
C(c(x1)) → A(a(a(b(x1))))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a(x1) → b(c(x1))
b(a(b(x1))) → x1
c(c(x1)) → a(a(a(b(x1))))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
  ↳ QTRS Reverse
  ↳ QTRS Reverse

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

C(c(x1)) → A(a(b(x1)))
A(x1) → B(c(x1))
C(c(x1)) → A(b(x1))
A(x1) → C(x1)
C(c(x1)) → B(x1)
C(c(x1)) → A(a(a(b(x1))))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a(x1) → b(c(x1))
b(a(b(x1))) → x1
c(c(x1)) → a(a(a(b(x1))))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 1 SCC with 2 less nodes.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
QDP
          ↳ QDPToSRSProof
  ↳ QTRS Reverse
  ↳ QTRS Reverse

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

C(c(x1)) → A(a(b(x1)))
C(c(x1)) → A(b(x1))
A(x1) → C(x1)
C(c(x1)) → A(a(a(b(x1))))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a(x1) → b(c(x1))
b(a(b(x1))) → x1
c(c(x1)) → a(a(a(b(x1))))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The finiteness of this DP problem is implied by strong termination of a SRS due to [12].


↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDPToSRSProof
QTRS
              ↳ QTRS Reverse
  ↳ QTRS Reverse
  ↳ QTRS Reverse

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a(x1) → b(c(x1))
b(a(b(x1))) → x1
c(c(x1)) → a(a(a(b(x1))))
C(c(x1)) → A(a(b(x1)))
C(c(x1)) → A(b(x1))
A(x1) → C(x1)
C(c(x1)) → A(a(a(b(x1))))

Q is empty.

We have reversed the following QTRS:
The set of rules R is

a(x1) → b(c(x1))
b(a(b(x1))) → x1
c(c(x1)) → a(a(a(b(x1))))
C(c(x1)) → A(a(b(x1)))
C(c(x1)) → A(b(x1))
A(x1) → C(x1)
C(c(x1)) → A(a(a(b(x1))))

The set Q is empty.
We have obtained the following QTRS:

a(x) → c(b(x))
b(a(b(x))) → x
c(c(x)) → b(a(a(a(x))))
c(C(x)) → b(a(A(x)))
c(C(x)) → b(A(x))
A(x) → C(x)
c(C(x)) → b(a(a(A(x))))

The set Q is empty.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDPToSRSProof
            ↳ QTRS
              ↳ QTRS Reverse
QTRS
                  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
  ↳ QTRS Reverse
  ↳ QTRS Reverse

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a(x) → c(b(x))
b(a(b(x))) → x
c(c(x)) → b(a(a(a(x))))
c(C(x)) → b(a(A(x)))
c(C(x)) → b(A(x))
A(x) → C(x)
c(C(x)) → b(a(a(A(x))))

Q is empty.

Using Dependency Pairs [1,15] we result in the following initial DP problem:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

A1(x) → C1(b(x))
C1(c(x)) → B(a(a(a(x))))
A1(x) → B(x)
C1(c(x)) → A1(a(x))
C1(c(x)) → A1(x)
C1(C(x)) → B(a(A(x)))
C1(C(x)) → A1(A(x))
C1(C(x)) → A1(a(A(x)))
C1(C(x)) → B(a(a(A(x))))
C1(C(x)) → B(A(x))
C1(C(x)) → A2(x)
C1(c(x)) → A1(a(a(x)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a(x) → c(b(x))
b(a(b(x))) → x
c(c(x)) → b(a(a(a(x))))
c(C(x)) → b(a(A(x)))
c(C(x)) → b(A(x))
A(x) → C(x)
c(C(x)) → b(a(a(A(x))))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDPToSRSProof
            ↳ QTRS
              ↳ QTRS Reverse
                ↳ QTRS
                  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
QDP
                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
  ↳ QTRS Reverse
  ↳ QTRS Reverse

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

A1(x) → C1(b(x))
C1(c(x)) → B(a(a(a(x))))
A1(x) → B(x)
C1(c(x)) → A1(a(x))
C1(c(x)) → A1(x)
C1(C(x)) → B(a(A(x)))
C1(C(x)) → A1(A(x))
C1(C(x)) → A1(a(A(x)))
C1(C(x)) → B(a(a(A(x))))
C1(C(x)) → B(A(x))
C1(C(x)) → A2(x)
C1(c(x)) → A1(a(a(x)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a(x) → c(b(x))
b(a(b(x))) → x
c(c(x)) → b(a(a(a(x))))
c(C(x)) → b(a(A(x)))
c(C(x)) → b(A(x))
A(x) → C(x)
c(C(x)) → b(a(a(A(x))))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 1 SCC with 6 less nodes.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDPToSRSProof
            ↳ QTRS
              ↳ QTRS Reverse
                ↳ QTRS
                  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
                    ↳ QDP
                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
QDP
                          ↳ Narrowing
  ↳ QTRS Reverse
  ↳ QTRS Reverse

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

A1(x) → C1(b(x))
C1(c(x)) → A1(a(x))
C1(c(x)) → A1(x)
C1(C(x)) → A1(A(x))
C1(C(x)) → A1(a(A(x)))
C1(c(x)) → A1(a(a(x)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a(x) → c(b(x))
b(a(b(x))) → x
c(c(x)) → b(a(a(a(x))))
c(C(x)) → b(a(A(x)))
c(C(x)) → b(A(x))
A(x) → C(x)
c(C(x)) → b(a(a(A(x))))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By narrowing [15] the rule A1(x) → C1(b(x)) at position [0] we obtained the following new rules:

A1(a(b(x0))) → C1(x0)



↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDPToSRSProof
            ↳ QTRS
              ↳ QTRS Reverse
                ↳ QTRS
                  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
                    ↳ QDP
                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
                        ↳ QDP
                          ↳ Narrowing
QDP
                              ↳ Narrowing
  ↳ QTRS Reverse
  ↳ QTRS Reverse

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

C1(c(x)) → A1(a(x))
C1(c(x)) → A1(x)
C1(C(x)) → A1(A(x))
A1(a(b(x0))) → C1(x0)
C1(C(x)) → A1(a(A(x)))
C1(c(x)) → A1(a(a(x)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a(x) → c(b(x))
b(a(b(x))) → x
c(c(x)) → b(a(a(a(x))))
c(C(x)) → b(a(A(x)))
c(C(x)) → b(A(x))
A(x) → C(x)
c(C(x)) → b(a(a(A(x))))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By narrowing [15] the rule C1(C(x)) → A1(A(x)) at position [0] we obtained the following new rules:

C1(C(x0)) → A1(C(x0))



↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDPToSRSProof
            ↳ QTRS
              ↳ QTRS Reverse
                ↳ QTRS
                  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
                    ↳ QDP
                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
                        ↳ QDP
                          ↳ Narrowing
                            ↳ QDP
                              ↳ Narrowing
QDP
                                  ↳ DependencyGraphProof
  ↳ QTRS Reverse
  ↳ QTRS Reverse

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

C1(c(x)) → A1(a(x))
C1(c(x)) → A1(x)
A1(a(b(x0))) → C1(x0)
C1(C(x0)) → A1(C(x0))
C1(C(x)) → A1(a(A(x)))
C1(c(x)) → A1(a(a(x)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a(x) → c(b(x))
b(a(b(x))) → x
c(c(x)) → b(a(a(a(x))))
c(C(x)) → b(a(A(x)))
c(C(x)) → b(A(x))
A(x) → C(x)
c(C(x)) → b(a(a(A(x))))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 1 SCC with 1 less node.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDPToSRSProof
            ↳ QTRS
              ↳ QTRS Reverse
                ↳ QTRS
                  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
                    ↳ QDP
                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
                        ↳ QDP
                          ↳ Narrowing
                            ↳ QDP
                              ↳ Narrowing
                                ↳ QDP
                                  ↳ DependencyGraphProof
QDP
  ↳ QTRS Reverse
  ↳ QTRS Reverse

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

C1(c(x)) → A1(a(x))
C1(c(x)) → A1(x)
A1(a(b(x0))) → C1(x0)
C1(C(x)) → A1(a(A(x)))
C1(c(x)) → A1(a(a(x)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a(x) → c(b(x))
b(a(b(x))) → x
c(c(x)) → b(a(a(a(x))))
c(C(x)) → b(a(A(x)))
c(C(x)) → b(A(x))
A(x) → C(x)
c(C(x)) → b(a(a(A(x))))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We have reversed the following QTRS:
The set of rules R is

a(x1) → b(c(x1))
b(a(b(x1))) → x1
c(c(x1)) → a(a(a(b(x1))))

The set Q is empty.
We have obtained the following QTRS:

a(x) → c(b(x))
b(a(b(x))) → x
c(c(x)) → b(a(a(a(x))))

The set Q is empty.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
  ↳ QTRS Reverse
QTRS
  ↳ QTRS Reverse

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a(x) → c(b(x))
b(a(b(x))) → x
c(c(x)) → b(a(a(a(x))))

Q is empty.

We have reversed the following QTRS:
The set of rules R is

a(x1) → b(c(x1))
b(a(b(x1))) → x1
c(c(x1)) → a(a(a(b(x1))))

The set Q is empty.
We have obtained the following QTRS:

a(x) → c(b(x))
b(a(b(x))) → x
c(c(x)) → b(a(a(a(x))))

The set Q is empty.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
  ↳ QTRS Reverse
  ↳ QTRS Reverse
QTRS

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a(x) → c(b(x))
b(a(b(x))) → x
c(c(x)) → b(a(a(a(x))))

Q is empty.